by Kelly M Bray (not verified) | Sat, 2010-02-06 19:19
Oh and by the way the contract with MAA is for 292,6000$. Development costs by the attorneys branch, oops I mean the Executive Branch, are around 36,000$ for an approximate total of 328, 600$. That is still an appreciable amount whether or not it is still within the 10% limit. While a per cap may be taxable, it depends on what you spend it on. If you spend it on tax deductible items then it is not a problem. I think Congressman Supernaw's differing view ( not "spin" ) is that it is more efficient to give a per cap in times of limited funding. It also takes the Nation out of a paternalistic position of trying to micromanage what families do with the money.
by Kelly M Bray (not verified) | Sat, 2010-02-06 19:03
Another glitch is that minors will not be issued a debit card. Their parents or guardians must pay up front and take the time and effort to fill out and send in the paperwork to be reimbursed. And then wait........
Comments
Oh and by the way the contract with MAA is for 292,6000$. Development costs by the attorneys branch, oops I mean the Executive Branch, are around 36,000$ for an approximate total of 328, 600$. That is still an appreciable amount whether or not it is still within the 10% limit. While a per cap may be taxable, it depends on what you spend it on. If you spend it on tax deductible items then it is not a problem. I think Congressman Supernaw's differing view ( not "spin" ) is that it is more efficient to give a per cap in times of limited funding. It also takes the Nation out of a paternalistic position of trying to micromanage what families do with the money.
Another glitch is that minors will not be issued a debit card. Their parents or guardians must pay up front and take the time and effort to fill out and send in the paperwork to be reimbursed. And then wait........